Showing posts with label about. Show all posts
Showing posts with label about. Show all posts
Welcome to IRL, an ongoing feature where we talk about the gadgets, apps and toys we're using in real life and take a second look at products that already got the formal review treatment.

IRL: A rant about Nintendo's Virtual Console service

Before you send in your angry emails, comments and tweets that decry me as a hatchet-wielding antichrist, let's begin by saying that I'm not a gamer. I do play games, but I have no specific allegiance to a console or manufacturer -- I simply go where the fun is. My console history, for editorial balance, includes the VIC 20, Commodore 64, NES, Mega Drive (Genesis), PlayStation, PlayStation 2, Xbox 360 and the Wii. That means that I'm about as much of a dilettante as you can be, and there's no bias or malice in the following. Just disappointment.

My wife, you see, isn't a fan of technology. And yet, despite never joining in games, she holds a soft spot for the Super NES. She takes on (and beats) all-comers on Super Mario Kart, but her favorite game, and the one that she's probably devoted the most time to, is Tetris Attack. For those not in the know, it's a reskinned version of the Japanese puzzle game Panel De Pon, which was later reskinned as Pokémon Puzzle League and, later, Puzzle League for the DS. Anyway, my wife's friend recently came over, and we dug out the SNES so the two of them could while away the time. Unfortunately, the console is now 22 years old, and both controllers are now nearly unusable. "Never mind," said I, dusting off our unused Wii. After all, I'd heard plenty about the Virtual Console service that promised nearly every SNES game had been added to the digital store, and it wouldn't take long before they could play the game with the Wiimotes doubling as controllers.

This is where things start to fall apart. Nintendo, for some capricious reason, has declined to release Tetris Attack for the Virtual Console. I say for some "capricious reason," but it's because Henk Rogers, CEO of the Tetris Company, is annoyed that the game carries his beloved branding. Heartbroken, we decided that as a sop (and to get the evening's frivolities going), we'd buy Pokémon Puzzle League, despite how annoying Pokémon is for anyone who isn't a Pokémon fan.

Before you can buy the game (or click on the entry in the store), the console requests you buy Nintendo Store credits. So, after another five minutes of trying to put credit card information onto the system (which isn't the easiest in the world, I assure you), we're finally in a position to purchase the game. Except it's at this point, when you click through, that Nintendo decides to tell you that you can't use this game without purchasing the Nintendo Classic controller. Which wasn't going to be possible at 8 p.m. on a Saturday.

What's the moral of the story? There are two, I guess. Firstly, don't be the sort of self-absorbed ass who just presumes a company would make logical decisions instead of doing the research. That level of self-absorption could also manifest itself in the decision to write 700 words on the subject and attempt to pretend this isn't merely the most first-world of first-world problems. I'm happy to accept the charge, and my hubris will linger forever in the £7 that sit on my Wii, unused for time immemorial.

The second, of course, is that for the sort of novice consumer looking to buy a product from Nintendo, the company doesn't make things easy. After all, it could have shown me before I added my cash that I didn't have the necessary accessory. It could have also simply rebranded the title as Yoshi's Puzzle League, since a short trawl of the internet shows there's more than one aggrieved, self-absorbed Brit wanting to see this game on the Virtual Console. I don't expect a company to bend over backward to cater to my every need, but I do wonder why Nintendo couldn't have made this process easier.

 Comments

View the original article here

IRL: A rant about Nintendo's Virtual Console service

BlackBerry's future as a phonemaker came into question yesterday when Reuters reported that CEO John Chen would consider selling its handset division. Naturally, the company sought to set the record straight... with a blog post from Chen himself published earlier today.

"I want to assure you that I have no intention of selling off or abandoning this business any time soon," he wrote, noting that his comments were taken out of context. So what exactly did he mean? Chen quietly crashed a reporter's roundtable with BlackBerry enterprise chief John Sims this morning (apparently in search of a cup of coffee) -- here's what he told us about the Reuters interview and the future of BlackBerry's phones.

"I'm working very hard to find a way to make money in the handset business. Then the question is 'if you don't make money in the handset business, what are you going to do?' I said, well, being a businessperson, if you try long enough and you can't make money, I mean, I'm in the business of making money. If I can't make money in the handset business, of course I can't do the handset business. That's kind of like an obvious thing.

But they -- some people at Reuters loved that last statement. That became the big news. There was no news here. The only news is that we're committed to the handset business, and we're going to make it work."

Here's the thing about Chen: He's a pragmatist. He's confident that the company can make money while making phones, but he admits that he'd have to rethink that stance if BlackBerry can't turn its handset fortunes around. That's it. Sort of a no-brainer, right? Sims added that there isn't really a point of no return in this situation, either -- BlackBerry will keep monitoring the situation and cranking out phones until it's clear it doesn't make any more sense to. That milestone could take months, maybe years to hit. Maybe BlackBerry won't hit it at all, if they get sales up and unit costs down.

There's something a little troubling about the fact that plenty of people took the headline at face value and just ran with it. To many, BlackBerry has already died; its fight already lost. That's not entirely fair -- there are still at least a few handsets barreling down the pipeline, and there's still over $2.5 billion tucked away in Waterloo's coffers. But it is possible that the nature of the relationship consumers have built with BlackBerry -- one based on having a physical thing in their pockets -- may eventually have to change, not that anyone particularly wants it to. And that's the truth.

 Comments

View the original article here

BlackBerry's about money first, phones second (and that's just fine)

Blogger Widgets

Random Posts

Blogger Widgets
Blogger Tips and TricksLatest Tips For BloggersBlogger Tricks

Blog Archive

Search This Blog

My Blog List